November 12-18 Discussion 2

2). Briefly outline an example of collaborative conflict resolution that you have engaged in. Contrast that with competitive conflict. Which was more satisfying to you? To the other party?

The book writes that the ideal conflict-resolution strategy for any group is one of the win-win, or collaboration. These are typically good for conflict that will adversely affect two groups, or when the consequences can largely affect a group. Being the President of Sigma Nu gives me many opportunities to experience collaborative conflict resolution. Today we had to figure out how we were going to approve some of our funds. Two committees in Sigma Nu wanted the funding. After listening to both committees about why they deserved the funding, we were able to come to a consensus and spread the funding across the two committees. This was a win-win situation for both committees, though they did not get full funding, they were each able to get enough funding to begin their projects, and be able to support the projects the rest of the way on their own. Competitive conflict is more oriented towards a win-lose. Self-interest dominates over mutual interest. It can be fun when “healthy competition” is involved. The book suggests that small groups use competitive strategies when there is limited time or resources and when the larger goals of the group are enhanced by its use. I would prefer to use collaborative conflict resolution, as both parties will be satisfied. However, when resources are limited, and both parties understand and have mutual consent, competitive conflict can address issues effectively and quickly.